About Me

Name:Steve Yuhas
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

Hollywood is Dead? Not So Bill O’Reilly

On Wednesday’s edition of the O’Reilly Factor on the Fox News Channel Bill O’Reilly made an observation about the Academy Awards, more affectionately known as the Oscars, saying, “nobody cares.”  I’m all for O’Reilly coming to our fair city, but come on – nobody cares about the Academy Awards?  Have you tried to book a hotel, car or restaurant on the days leading up to the ceremony on Sunday evening?  People do care – they may not like all of the movies, but Hollywood is hardly poised to fold.

So what is it about Hollywood that O’Reilly is willing to pretend that nobody cares about the biggest night in Hollywood?  He put forward the argument that nobody cares about Hollywood anymore and people (presuming he means the ‘folks’ that he so often references) feel disassociated with movies and entertainment.  He even said, “It’s over out here.”

Nothing could be further from the truth and for a guy who had to book the Four Seasons in April and for those less fortunate who are now on a waiting list for rooms within 20 miles of the theater – I’m hard pressed to find anyone who would agree with O’Reilly on the downfall of Hollywood.

One thing is certain, though, and that is too many people in politics and in the media (including my fellow conservative commentators and talk show hosts) attempt to paint Hollywood as a bad guy because movies are made that do not meet with one side or the others social or political agenda.  It may be true that some movies are not exactly the wave the flag dramas that we saw after or during the war years, but Hollywood is no less patriotic than any other city in America – it is just Hollywood has a lens pointed to it every single day of the year where a place like Madison, Wisconsin or Houston do not.

The problem with O’Reilly’s analysis is not only that Hollywood is far from dead – it did have a tumultuous few months with the writer’s strike, but dead – is that the evidence he uses is how many millions of dollars a film grosses and whether or not George Clooney made movies that he liked.  According to the intrepid analyst for Fox News Clooney made “anti-American” movies over and over again – same movie; same message: America is bad.

Kind of harsh and completely untrue; not because Hollywood has done a lot of good in not only making movies that are worth seeing, but also because over the years I have been lucky in life and have been able to get to know people who work in the industry and no matter where I go or who I talk to – people in Hollywood (and the general area) all want greatness for the country.

Let’s be clear – I disagree with much of the political positions taken by a lot of the people in Hollywood, but the paradox is that I can disassociate the Hollywood full of entertainers and hard working people behind the scenes with the Hollywood activists who try to bring their political issue to the forefront by using their well-known brand.  It sounds almost “insider” and ostentatious, but it is true: people in Hollywood may be “misguided” as it relates to my political world view, but for them it works and like it or not they are involved in the American culture.

A culture, by the way, that is not distinct to Hollywood, but is shared with liberal places around the country, but focused on Hollywood because of the glitz, glamour and shows devoted to watching the famous arrive and depart from red carpets and the mediocre trip to a restaurant or store.

The other day I was at Jose Eber in Beverly Hills and I overheard one of the most interesting things.  When a person is getting a manicure the ears wander and you can be taken in any direction – this day I was taken to the chair behind Rosa and the conversation was about politics.  The stylist asked her client (a client most of you would recognize), “Do you want Clinton or Obama to win?”  Client’s answer, “Neither, I’m supporting McCain.”

Huh?  I wasn’t the only Republican – and not in the closet either – in the salon?  It was like I saw a straight guy doing hair or something from another planet.  This client is Hollywood to the 9th degree – don’t get more Hollywood and he openly gave his opinion of the race for the White House not by hiding behind the salon’s namesake either – he was out and out saying, proudly, that he was voting for McCain.  Hollywood may be a place where people make controversial films about controversial topics (some may very well have the feel of an anti-American movie), but when it comes to politics there is nothing about Hollywood that makes it any different than any other city in America – except you can recognize everyone… even in the comfort zone of a salon.

People like Bill O’Reilly are smart and I’m sure he didn’t mean to say that Hollywood was an irrelevant entity simply because he disliked a few movies this year.  Moreover, it was probably not his intention to say that people are walking away from movies (they’re not) because they no longer relate to the American people.  If that were the case studios and production companies would be folding up shop and that is not happening.

What is happening is that people are being given a choice in what to watch.  Want a kids movie? Sure, Disney will make one.  Want something that makes you think about America’s foreign policy?  Clooney will make one.  And if you want a romantic comedy or something with a bit of action, thrill or horror – that can be had as well – so what is changing in Hollywood that makes many in the GOP (my party) and many in the press believe (or wish) that Hollywood was going away?

Simple: it is an applause line.  It is very easy when you need a sip of water or need to turn the page on the stump to say “I don’t want Hollywood culture; I want American culture.”  Emphasize the American part for a few sips – it assures more and longer applause.  Hollywood does not want you to adopt the values of a film; Hollywood would rather raise questions about issues and entertain.  Movies are a business, after all, and it can only sustain people ‘walking away’ for so long before it gets back on track and people are not walking.

As to the Oscars: people may not be as excited about them this year as they were in years gone by, but that is a result of many things – not the least of which is choice.  To compare the Academy Awards ratings of today against those of even a decade ago is to ignore the advent of new technologies and mediums to be entertained.  Cable allows you to keep up with the Jones’ while the Internet allows you to know who won what with a ticket across the bottom of the computer screen.

Hollywood is not evil, the people working in television and film are not evil and nobody wants any harm to come to our nation – least of all those people who work in film (I think their work after 9-11 proves their patriotism regardless of the movies they make).  They rally around the flag like anyone else, but they are also provocateurs when it comes to things happening in the country.  Some are nutty, but the loons are booed off the stage (Michael Moore).

Counting Hollywood out today is just the wrong way to look at the multi-billion dollar industry that it is.  There is an easy way to test whether or not the Oscars excite people in the industry: try to book a room, reservation at a good restaurant or a car on Sunday.  You won’t be able to get it and that, more than anything else, is proof positive that Hollywood is not only relevant, but cares – whether or not O’Reilly or anyone else does.

The funny thing is that with all the talk about the irrelevance of Hollywood there are sure a lot of politicians and pundits who spend time talking about it.

Steve Yuhas is a radio talk show host on AM 600 KOGO in southern California. He may be reached at steve@steveyuhas.com or www.steveyuhas.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Beth Twitty: Van der Sloot a Liar – Confession Ignored

Cable programs, desperate for another missing person or cop killing husband, broke in with news alerts last week as word came from Holland that a tape was being released that purported to show Joran van der Sloot confessing to killing Alabaman Natalee Holloway while she vacationed in Aruba in 2005. So compelling was the tape that Beth Twitty jumped on a plane to travel to Holland to see it.

 

When she returned to the United States she took to the talk show circuit and began telling the tale of watching pieces of the tape where van der Sloot talks openly, while smoking pot, about how her daughter died in Aruba in 2005.

It could be that the tape is true and Joran is guilty of disposing of a body because nothing in the tape remotely comes close to the cloak and dagger style of death that Twitty has been touting over the years as the way her daughter met her unfortunate fate.  Van der Sloot does not mention passing Holloway any drugs nor does he participate in the disposal of her body (he called his body disposal friend for that) – so with all of the scrutiny of the tape why is Joran still free?

Quite simply it is because Twitty trained the world that van der Sloot was a liar and pariah who could not be trusted.  So, when parts of the taped ‘confession’ began falling apart we (and investigators) did as we’ve been trained: we did not believe him.

 

The conundrum for Beth Twitty is now that America has bought into her “Joran drugged then killed Natalee and threw her into the ocean” scenario – when the tape fell apart so too did the confession.  For anyone else in the world this tape would be pay dirt, but for Twitty the tape is the beginning of the end for the re-re-re-re-arrest dream for Joran van der Sloot.  Even if the re-re-re-re-arrest happens all an attorney need do is play all of the countless appearances where Beth Twitty spins her tale and then tells us all to discount all that comes out of the mouth of van der Sloot.

Twitty, and only Twitty, can be blamed for the situation where a confession is insufficient to convict a person of any crime since he cannot be believed.  Twitty pushed a scenario so forcefully that her daughter was drugged and murdered by van der Sloot that anything as simple as an accidental death followed by a terribly callous disposal is too simple to believe.

But, no matter how the world media cuts up the tape at most van der Sloot comes across as an uncaring cad who called a friend after Holloway died after having suffered some kind of seizure.

There is no way to verify the story because the person, who was named in the tape, was located and he was not in Aruba at the time of the disappearance.  You have to question, though, would someone really remain quiet about disposing of a body that captivated the world for more than two years?  It is hard enough to find a designated driver when you are in college – can you imagine a designated body disposer?

It is just an odd story that doesn’t add up.  Even so –Twitty would have had hope in punishing those responsible for her daughters death, but the tape doesn’t show van der Sloot admitting anything illegal except the disposal of a body and that, I’m told from an Aruba attorney, is little more than the equivalent of a misdemeanor.  Driving drunk in Alabama gets you more time in prison than getting rid of a body so even if Joran is telling the truth about what happened – he didn’t kill her and he didn’t do anything that wrong.  Disgusting yes, but hardly illegal.

 

Over the last few days I have received hundreds of emails asking me if I owe the Twitty’s an apology for the things I said and written about Beth Twitty and her kin-folk over the years.  The answer is a very short no.  Nothing ever said about Twitty was untrue or not supported by facts.  Is van der Sloot the model of what I’d want one of my nephews or brothers to be?  Never.  But his being a cad does not make him a murderer.

Beth Twitty did not just accuse Joran of disposing of a body – she accused him, quite specifically, of slipping Natalee Holloway drugs while in a club then killing her.  There has never been a time when Twitty changed that scenario because her daughter could not have been drinking or doing drugs because she just didn’t “do that.”

Joran’s tape is salacious and it made for good television, but because it is van der Sloot something, anything, has to be verified before any legal action is taken against him and there simply is nothing new in the tape – other than a ‘confession’ under the influence of pot that says nothing happened. Joran’s story, if anything, exonerates him of murder.  All he did, if we can believe him now, is call a friend to get rid of a body.  A horrible thing, but not murder.

The sad thing here is that Beth Twitty is partly to blame for people being skeptical of the ‘confession’ of van der Sloot.  Perhaps had she not been so forceful in desiring to paint a teenager a killer people would believe him today.  Twitty said everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie and to discount that two year training program today would be silly unless something in the tape can be verified.  As of this writing nothing has.

 

Steve Yuhas is a radio talk show host on AM 600 KOGO in southern California and may be reached atsteve@steveyuhas.com or www.steveyuhas.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »